|

My
Mid-Life Crisis
by
Sam Smith
February 1, 2005
I
turn 44 tomorrow, so the timing is about right for a mid-life
crisis, no? Some guys deal with their mid-life crises by
buying little red sports cars, but most of us professors
can barely afford the payments on our mid-sized economy
sedans as it is. Some cheat on their wives with pretty girls
15 years younger than them, but my wife is a pretty
girl 15 years younger than me, so that seems, I don’t know,
redundant. Lacking access to these kinds of conventional
diversions, then, I guess I’m going to have to tackle my
crisis head-on. The worst part is that I never saw yesterday’s
assault coming.
In
some respects Monday, 1.31.05 was a pretty good day. In
others it was a disaster. It was as though events in the
external world were somehow conspiring to bait me about
my life and the choices I’ve made in living it. It’s like
when you’ve just been dumped by someone you were crazy about
and all of a sudden every song you hear seems to be about
your life.
First,
a bit of background. Last year, as part of a professional
program I was participating in with Lee Hecht Harrison (one
of the largest and most successful employment counseling
firms in the world), I took a little survey designed to
help me understand what my primary motivators were in seeking
the right job. The questionnaire evaluated me on things
like need for financial stability, need for wealth (not
the same thing), need for service (making the world a better
place, etc.), need for family, and so on. I think there
were maybe 10-12 qualities that we wound up ranking. (I
remember that wealth was way down on my list. It would be
nice to be rich, sure, but I’ve never been willing to do
what I’d have to do to get rich.)
As
it turned out, the items that ranked #1 and #2 on my list
got the guns turned on them yesterday, with the result being
me wondering what the hell I was thinking when I decided
last year to go in search of academic jobs.
My
#2 most important goal was service, and this is something
I’ve known about myself for a long time. I have a need to
make the world around me better if I can, and when I feel
like I’m not making a meaningful difference in people’s
lives it starts to wear on me. Such was life in the corporate
world, where a lot of days the most I could possibly say
is that I’d helped move some money from one pile to another,
while acknowledging that there was no moral difference whatsoever
in the two piles. All cash, no soul. It was hard to live
with myself at times.
The
upshot of this revelation was obvious B for me personally,
service and meaningful contribution to society has always
been primarily about teaching, the thing that I have always
felt I was best at, and deep inside the thing I have felt
was my one true calling in life.
The
goal the survey IDed as #1 for me is a bit more complicated,
and I admit up front that it probably doesn’t make me look
very good in the eyes of many. But #1 was status
B I have a profound need to be recognized and valorized
for my accomplishments. If this means I’m insecure or an
egomaniac, so be it. I understand the roots of the issue
pretty well, though, and if you understand a couple things
about me it probably even makes a bit of sense.
First,
ever since I was old enough to have anything like a self-image,
I’ve always felt that I was meant (intended, destined,
fated, whatever) to accomplish something major in my life.
I don’t recall anybody ever telling me this, so maybe I came
out of the womb thus disfigured.
Second,
I grew up in a Southern Baptist household that took certain
lessons quite seriously. One I recall my grandparents making
a big deal of was the Biblical
Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14-28), which made
clear that we were not only expected to put the gifts God
had given us to good use, but further, that doing so was a
moral obligation, a responsibility of the first order. God
made you smart, I was told, and therefore it is important
that you use your brains to help people.
The
lesson took, I guess you’d say. Even as I wandered away from
Christianity, I never strayed from the lesson of this one
moral imperative. Not inside, anyway. It’s clear enough from
what I say above about moving money from pile to pile that
as much as I might have believed certain things, I did not
always live them as I should have.
In
other words, for better or worse, I’m the kind of person who
needs to make the world a better place and who needs
to be recognized for it. These things are my crack. If
you’re the sort who translates this into "he’s the kind
of guy who does the right things for the wrong reasons,"
well, like I say, so be it. I am what I am, and it’s not possible
to fully realize your potential without first understanding
and accepting where you’re starting from.
Anyway,
I wound up accepting an offer to become a professor in the
School of Journalism and Mass Communication here
at St. Bonaventure, and while I’ve worked like a damned rented
mule since arriving on campus in August, I have loved the
fact that finally I’m back on the right path. I’m teaching,
and I’m in an environment where my expertise and contributions
are appreciated by my colleagues. I feel useful and I feel
validated. So there’s goal #2 and goal #1 co-existing happily.
Been a long time since that happened.
But
if you look at my blog for yesterday, you’ll notice that a
couple of stories - one
in the Chronicle of Higher Education
and one reported in the news media - really
torqued me off. First was the notice that the goddamned government,
may they all roast in Hell, are contemplating a move to make
tuition benefits taxable. As I noted in my post, this one
is more than just the sort of stupid policy I expect out of
the bought-up and sold-out whores who run our kleptocracy
these days. This one is personal, because I have a sister
who works at Wake
Forest University,
and one of the things that made the job so attractive to her
was that her kids could attend college there free. Now, Wake
is one of the top 25 universities in the nation, so this is
a big deal, especially since my sister and her husband
will likely never be able to afford the tuition that places
like Wake charge. This may be the one and only shot that my
niece and nephew will ever have at this kind of educational
opportunity. But will the additional tax hit proposed by this
bit of "reform" put that education out of reach?
By
the way, according
to my colleague, Dr. Denny Wilkins: "Why does the
federal government want to do this? To do what it always does:
Get more money out of the governed. In this case, the feds
argue that taxing this tuition benefit would raise $1.9 billion
(yes, that’s with a B) over 10 years. That money (seems like
a lot, doesn’t it?) would pay for only 10 days of the American
incursion into Iraq, where we’re dropping more than $200 million
a day with no end in sight, elections notwithstanding."
Well, there you have it. My niece and nephew might suffer,
but it's for a good cause.
The
other
story that set me off began with the news that a distressingly
high percentage of our high school kids think that darned
1st Amendment just goes too far, and that newspapers
should have to get gummit clearance before they run their
stories. In other
words, they kinda like the old Pravda model. Then I
saw the rest of the story and realized that not only are these
kids possessed of solid 4th Reich thinking, their
teachers and principals are, too.
By
the end of the day a fabulous ethics roundtable panel in my
J/MC 101 class, where I brought in almost the whole faculty
(and a top-shelf crew of people they are, too) to share their
own real-world ethical experiences and challenges with my
students, had been overshadowed, if not swallowed whole, by
the larger, butt-ugliest reality of being an educator in this
country at this moment in time. As I told my wife when I got
home, it’s really a perfect storm of stupid.
<!
B rant mode on>
It
goes something like this. Once upon a time, back in the good
old days, the unfortunate truth was that a lot of people just
weren’t that swooft. As I like to joke, half the population
is statistically below average.
But
now it’s worse, and getting worser:
1:
The anti-intellectual camps in our society are growing increasingly
aggressive in their pursuit of ignorance. The worst and
least educated among us have been emboldened by the attention
paid to them by cynical power elites and have not been subtle
enough to see how they’re being played. Political victories
aplenty have validated, in their minds, the triumph of common
sense over the arrogance of Abook learnin’, and the result
is not just a society that’s getting dumber by the day, but
one that’s pretty comfortable with its ignorance. You might
say that large parts of America
are getting in touch with their inner doofus.
2:
Political power enables people to legally decree truth.
In the worst cases, this means that our less-informed fellow
citizens can bend the engines of power in society to the service
of blind dogma. Perhaps the most obvious manifestation here
is the herpes-like persistence of creationism, which now appears
to have abandoned "creation science" in favor of
something being styled as "intelligent design,"
but rest assured that science isn’t the only target in the
crosshairs. Not only does the country need more faith-based
science, history and government could also do with a corrective.
Despite the fact that we know the framers of the Constitution
to be Deists, not Christians, all occurrences of "God"
in the Constitutional canon are well on their way to being
reinterpreted as references to a fundamentalist personal savior
deity. In the same vein, Jefferson’s
overt language on the separation of church and state can only
have meant the very opposite of what it actually said. How
long before the Earth is flat again, with the Sun and all
the other heavenly bodies revolving around it?
3:
Our leaders are no longer content to starve education to death
- now they’re training howitzers on it. Budgets continue
to shrink, except in tech-driven vocational education; government
mandated information quota standardization results in actual
teaching being replaced by test prep; and yesterday’s news
about taxing ed benefits, well, one might expect more of that
kind of reasoning in coming years, not less.
Conclusion:
our educational system is now actively structured to prevent
the production of thinking citizens. But why?
Two
reasons. First, high-tech automatons are ideally suited to
revenue generation. It’s a new, information-society iteration
of Taylorism,
a re-mechanization of work that treats the worker as little
more than an expendable, replaceable cog in the money-printing
press. Second, from a political standpoint, people who do
as they’re told without thinking or questioning are far easier
to manipulate and manage.
In
short, our economic and political power elites have a vested
interest in keeping the rabble as dumb as possible, and we
seem to stand at a moment in history where these collective
forces of domination have decided to strike while the iron
is hot. For a variety of reasons, the early moments of the
3rd Millennium represent a watershed, and a lot
of capital is being expended to consolidate power, retool
the political and economic order, and establish a new hegemony
(if I might employ a term I have historically avoided due
to its inherent Leftist baggage).
So,
back to my mid-life crisis. Specifically, how does all this
relate to my little burst of introspection on the occasion
of my birthday?
Well,
let’s start with goal #2 above - my need to meaningfully contribute
to my society. In the context of America 2k5, we can file
my decision to be an educator under "L" for "Losing
Battles." To some extent I feel like the journey is 1000
miles long, and at the end of the day if I’ve traveled 100
miles I look up to discover that I still have 1200 miles left
to go. I feel like the guy in Monty Python & the Holy
Grail who’s running as hard as he can but never gets any
closer.
The
task of being a university instructor is a lot harder than
it was when I stepped in front of my first class in 1987,
and it’s getting harder every day. Students are less prepared
by their high schools on all measures I can identify - writing
skills, thinking skills, history, knowledge of government,
current events, etc. - and many seem to arrive in my classroom
expecting J/MC 101 to be every bit as exciting as Grand
Theft Auto. When it isn’t, their eyes glass over and it’s
the fault of the instructor.
[A
brief aside on this subject. My J/MC 101 class this semester
is, so far, worlds better than the one I taught last semester,
so I acknowledge that the story I’m telling here reflects
the worst of things, not the best. Still, I’m not setting
up any straw men - what I’m describing is a reality that probably
most all teachers at any level would recognize (save the 20%
who think the 1st Amendment is a problem, anyway
- they'd see the absence of critical thinking skills as good
thing, I suppose).]
Since
our students aren’t critical thinkers by nature or training,
it’s imperative that my colleagues and I make them
critical thinkers - this is a feckin’ journalism and mass
comm program, after all. Part of inculcating thinking skills
requires the professor to challenge the student, and a disturbing
number of these kids have not only never been challenged on
their belief systems, they don’t take kindly to me doing it.
When
I have to devote preparation energy and class time to the
sad fact that a number of them are highly suspicious of the
1st Amendment (I asked my 101 class on last semester’s
final if the 1st Amendment went "too far"
in granting freedom, and 11 out of 35 answered yes;
unfortunately, some of the ones who said no did so for reasons
that were borderline incomprehensible, so even those answers
failed to provide much solace - I mean, a chimp flipping a
coin could come up with "no" half the time, right?),
well, at that point I’m no longer in the higher education
business, I’m in the remedial junior high civics business.
So,
on item #2, get me a pole and point me at the nearest windmill.
As
for item #1 - my need for status and recognition - I find
myself wondering what could possibly afford me less status
than teaching. Roger Clemens will earn $18M this coming year
pitching for the Astros. During the season he’ll make roughly
35 starts, assuming he stays healthy, which comes to better
than $514K per start. That’s 20 times what a lot of our teachers
make in a year. Draw your own conclusions.
Forgive
me if this last bit seems a little self-indulgent, but in
many ways this is more a letter to myself than it is anything
else. As dull as the day to day details of my life probably
look to the uninterested observer, I suppose inside I’m the
lead in a terribly dramatic epic production. As we enter the
third act, our protagonist clicks off another year against
the time he’s been allotted in this life....
Even
somebody who has struggled as mightily against the tides of
age and convention as I have probably has to admit that by
the time you hit 45 you should have decided what you want
to be when you grow up. There is so much to love about what
I do for a living, but there is also the soul-numbing fact
that I have apparently chosen a cold and forbidding path through
a land that can’t decide whether it hates my kind or simply
doesn’t care.
A
sports car would be so much simpler...
Comments
|