|

Fear,
Loathing, and Great Reporting
Dr. Hunter S. Thompson is most remembered for over-the-top
writings and personality. But it's worth remembering that
he was also a damned fine reporter, with a gift for details
and one of the best crap detectors in history.
By
Sam Smith
(February
21, 2005) One of the brightest lights in the American
firmament blinked out Sunday. Word of Hunter Thompson's death
arrived at our house via the crawl on the network happy news
this morning, and there's irony enough in that fact alone.
Hunter Stockton Thompson, the Good Doctor, is most remembered
for his over-the-top tours des excès
Fear & Loathing in Las Vegas being the most famous.
But it's not the gonzo high spots I'll remember him for. What
has gotten so lost in the legend that Thompson became (and
the self-parody he sometimes lapsed into later in his career)
is that he was a damned fine reporter.
Forget
gonzo for a second. Before HST became an icon of the New Journalism
he was an exceptional practitioner of a more conventional journalism,
something that's evident to anybody who's read the early works
collected in The Great Shark Hunt: Gonzo Papers, Volume 1.
Thompson
had a gift for the details and one of the best crap detectors
in history. His flawless nose for the truths, dynamics, and
motivations driving the players starring in his stories lent
those narratives a quality that somehow fused unflinching
naturalism with sweeping mythology.
Read
"A Southern City with Northern Problems," for instance, where
Thompson examines the issue of race in his native Louisville:
"The
white power structure has given way in the public sector,
only to entrench itself more firmly in the private. And
the Negro especially the educated Negro feels
that his victories are hollow and his 'progress' is something
he reads about in the newspapers. The outlook for Louisville's
Negroes may have improved from 'separate but equal' to 'equal
but separate.' But that still leaves a good deal to be desired."
Read
Hells Angels, Thompson's landmark study of one of America's
unique subcultures. This wasn't just exceptional journalism,
it was some of the best scholarship I've ever read. It was
ethnography, the anthropological study of cultures, and whereas
some anthropologists study the rites, rituals, and folkways
of natives in exotic faraway jungles, Thompson studied the
rites, rituals, and folkways of natives living in exotic faraway
Oakland, Calif.
Read
Fear & Loathing on the Campaign Trail, which remains
perhaps the greatest political book I've ever encountered.
While Thompson became famous for harpooning Nixon "a
swine of a man and a jabbering dupe of a president [who] was
so crooked that he needed servants to help him screw his pants
on every morning" "Campaign Trail" made clear that
you didn't have to pick sides. He lashed on the Democrats
more violently than he did Nixon, in fact. And for good reason.
There's plenty of ineptitude and corruption in both camps,
it turns out a lesson America circa 2005 would do well
to learn.
As
tragic as Thompson's death is has there been a time
when we needed his honesty and brutality more than we do now?
I was somewhat heartened by the explosion of tributes
around the Web yesterday. My e-mail box was buried by individual
notes and list mailings from all directions, with some issuing
from journalists saying they'd never have become reporters
in the first place without his influence. Almost every blog
I checked had, at the very least, a link to an obit, which
is more than appropriate given how important, how absolutely
essential the pioneering work of people like Thompson and
Wolfe has been to the brand of interpretive journalism being
practiced in the more enlightened corners of cyberspace.
Further,
his death arrives at a moment when the journalism industry
is finally starting to contemplate issues that Thompson was
railing about four decades ago. A number of very serious figures
in the field have recently begun examining the repeated failings
of objectivity in the press, with one Geneva Overholser
of the Missouri School of Journalism telling The
Hartford Courant that 2004 was "the year when it finally
became unmistakably clear that objectivity has outlived its
usefulness as an ethical touchstone for journalism."
Hunter
tried to teach us that objectivity is a rule set that can
be gamed, corrupted, and shaped into a weapon for use against
the very principles it was developed to protect. He tried
to teach us that fact and truth aren't the same thing. Quoting
Faulkner, he noted that "the best fiction is far more true
than any kind of journalism and the best journalists
have always known this." He set an uncompromising determination
to get at the truth ahead of what he saw as artificial rules
and conventions, and if the "facts" got in the way of the
truth, well, that told you something about the facts, didn't
it?
Although
I never heard him say it in these words, Hunter S. Thompson
I think understood the artificial Red/Blue, Conservative/Liberal
divide that most Americans seem to have bought into for the
cynical construction that it is a rhetorical fluff
job that turns Americans with common cause against each other
and that serves the power elites in both parties to the detriment
of the public they take turns fleecing.
In short, Hunter Thompson was a champion of the common people.
Yes, his reporting was so crazed at times that you couldn't
be sure if you were reading an eyewitness account or a drug-addled
hallucination. But he remained to the end one of the most
unswervingly ethical reporters of our generation, a man whose
commitment to social justice and the public good trumped everything.
This
version of my Thompson obit originally appeared in the
Editor & Publisher online edition.
|